Cute Petite Busty Blonde Chloe 646-461-1474

Discussion in 'Craigs list & Backpage' started by Waterclone, Apr 2, 2013.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. Retoxicate

    Retoxicate

    Messages:
    689
    I had seen her on more than one occasion before deciding to hang it up for awhile. Waterclone's review is completely accurate and doesn't need to be duplicate.

    She is cute and sweet in a way that I haven't encountered much and made it worth the 240. Its not about her looks, but rather a nearly realistic GFE experience that I have not found as much with younger providers.

    Not sure about 300 though. Also, and this is a bit stupid, she's the type that is more a secret find that once everyone and her cousin is banging and reviewing takes away from the experience as it dismisses the fantasy that makes her different.
  2. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    And I say again, taste doesn't make someone better looking. If you like slim asians, then you will always find them more attractive than full figured white girls. That doesn't make them better looking. That just means you are more attracted to them. Personally, I have never seen a girl at an AMP that I'd thought was much better than a 7.

    Actually, never mind. The fact that DFK isn't one of your normal activities and that you are comparing an AMP experience to an independent escort indicates that we don't need to continue the conversation. We obviously have very different ideas about the hobby. No harm, no foul. You go your way and I'll go mine.
  3. pitman_nyc

    pitman_nyc

    Messages:
    461
    My last two experiences have included DFK, which is not the norm for me. One was 1 HR FS GFE for $180. The other was an AMP GFE but not FS. I did Asian digit insertion in both holes and got 3 HJ and a TS in 1HR for $60 house and $80 tip - but lots of kissing, which is also rare for Asians. I've got to count my lucky stars...oh, and yes, both were slimmer and better looking.
    Last edited: May 30, 2013
  4. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    Dont' take it personally, but this is a review thread. I don't think it qualifies as a review to make a judgement based on her pics.

    In my review I said that the pics are accurate. That was because they are clearly her and they were taken very recently, so they accurately reflect her general appearance. That said, she is one of those people who looks much better in person.

    Note: I am not trying to convince you to see her. It makes no difference to me. I just don't think such comments as "there are prettier girls" or "there are cheaper girls" belong in a review thread. Especially when made by someone who hasn't seen her. Everyone on this site knows there are cheaper girls, and girls who look different. That's not news to anyone. But a review thread should be for information about the specific girl, based on first hand experiences.

    IMHO
    Last edited: May 29, 2013
  5. Bozak

    Bozak

    Messages:
    73
    Don't take it personally, I'm not saying she's bad looking, she's cute, I may even call, but there are prettier girls out there for less, not DFK though and that's why her price is up there, which is fine, it's a premium service these days.
  6. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    Just out of curiosity, have you seen her, or are you simply going by the ads.
  7. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    Better body is a relative term. Some guys like big fake tits. Some guys like spinners who weigh less than 80lbs. Who is to say which is a better body? I won't challenge the fact that she might not be your preferred body type, but if she is the type someone is looking for, then you can't say there are better bodies out there. :)

    As for GFE at a lot lower price...

    Personally, I have rarely found satisfactory GFEs for under 300. Certainly there aren't any advertising on Eros. Most are much higher. Backpage has cheaper girls, but that's hit or miss. I'd say 10 or 15% of the time I might find a good GFE there, but the rest of the time, it's a crappy brothel type experience. Girls who seem like they aren't really into it, turning over as many guys as they can in a day.

    It doesn't matter to me if they do all the acronyms. To me, it's not GFE if the girl's obviously, unhappy and just working a job.
  8. Bozak

    Bozak

    Messages:
    73
    Definitley not a girl I'd pay that much for, better looking girls for less, but this just shows how much of a premium DFK has become.
  9. aroused

    aroused

    Messages:
    18
    She doesn't look like a blonde in the pics. Cute though, reminds me a little of Sara Thompson in the bottom pic.
  10. pitman_nyc

    pitman_nyc

    Messages:
    461
    Really? there's much better bodies out there with GFE service for a lot lower price.
    Just my $0.02.
  11. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
  12. nycfunnights

    nycfunnights

    Messages:
    73
    Her schedule is Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. I just got an email from her.
  13. mikede

    mikede

    Messages:
    740
    I e mailed and phoned,,, no response either way, but I did notice she did not have an ad on BP today so Waterclone gave us some good advice.
  14. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    When I first emailed her, I got a response the next day. Sorry, I should have mentioned that in the review.

    She is a part timer. A student. My experience is that most girls like that are only available on days when they post an ad and they don't check their messages on days when they aren't working.
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2013
  15. ralpert

    ralpert

    Messages:
    34
    Yea, I emailed her as well earlier this morning but have not gotten a reply yet - does phone work better?
  16. mikede

    mikede

    Messages:
    740
    Did you find that she was difficult to get to?
    I called a few hours ago and left message on voice mail.
    No reply yet.
  17. OpenMind

    OpenMind

    Messages:
    284
    No apology necessary. Great review
  18. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    See. This is why they don't let me out of the house.

    Apologies.
  19. Slinky Bender

    Slinky Bender The All Powerful Moderator

    Messages:
    17,951
    All I was asking is that you put the phone number in the format xxx-xxx-xxxx in the thread or post title.
  20. Waterclone

    Waterclone

    Messages:
    2,572
    Sorry. Lazy. Is this better?

    1) Contact info
    646-461-1474
    chloeblondenyc@gmail.com

    2) How you found out about her services.
    Backpage and a review elsewhere.

    3) Description of escort (also, does she match her pictures?)
    She 100 percent matches the pics. The can't be more than a few months old. Pretty. White. Fair complextion. Long straight blond/brown hair. Large natural breasts. Beautiful eyes. Some really nice tats as well.

    4) Description of location
    Nice hotel.

    5) Description of your expectations
    Since she's on backpage and in the sub 300 range, I didn't have extremely high expectations. But I liked that her had mentioned kissing as a favorite activity and the one review I saw was a good one. I am usually disappointed on BP, but every now and again, a good one pops up.

    6) Description of services provided
    Standard GFE services. DFK, DATY, BBBJ, multiple positions of CFS. Excellent conversation. Bubbly personality.

    7) Fees and tips given
    $240

    8) Whether this was your first experience with this agency/escort and if you plan on seeing again
    This was my first time with her, and I plan on seeing her often.

    9) Whether your expectations were met
    Exceeded.