Discussion in 'New York' started by samm_adams, Jun 26, 2001.
yep, thats them.
She still has email.
charlesangels (Becca) and societyladies (Janine) I think.
her info is on jag or try and get it in private...
she has no website and no e-mail anymore (so i hear)
she doesn't want her phone # posted on any public boards and i'd advise people to respect her wishes.
i think you can see her thru charlies angels and she is also on NY exotics for another agency...
maybe someone can post the name she goes by on those sites.
Does she have a website or photos? How can I contact her?
great post and a big DITTO!
We really have no right to be as intrusive as we are now.
Just as clients are very protective of their privacy rights with providers and personal information on boards, I feel that information that goes beyond session-related info is too much.
We don't ask anyone to save us from our personal issues, and we do have them, and neither is J asking us to help her. We don't need to boycott her. We need to stop discussing her like a bunch of women gossiping at the hairdresser. I think that would help her the most.
Just to go slightly off topic...
If you (or anyone) really cared about a provider and wanted to help her to get out of the biz, would calling the parents be a good idea?
I mean, the provider's parents can be the cause of her problems in the first place - abuse, not caring, etc. so calling may not even help. Hey, it can even make things worse? Her family could dis-own her and then she'll really go bad.
It's really scary, cause you can find out personal info on practically anyone these days.
I've met some true sweathearts, and they make me wonder why the hell they provide... and it makes me guilty as shit.
Maybe there are better ways?
Ladies, any comments!?
I didn't mean "going down the tubes" in reference to Janelle's personal problems. I suspect whatever those have been around for quite a while, not necessarily any less than they are now.
What I mean is: her initial reviews raved on how personal or "human" her service was, a different dimension than the so-called GFE that people rant about.
When I saw her a last year a bit after the intial noise, the service was still very human, BBBJ was available if I had wanted it, but she seemed to want to to one shot only, and did the second shot when it seemed that I was expecting it. Not quite the stuff that her inital reviewers spoke about.
Now, based on the review above, it seems she's gone down the tubes to basically wanting $400 for an impersonal 15 minute assembly line job. And all the reviews in between have been on this exact same trajectory. So personal issues aside, its clear that she's probably a $100 girl, at this point, in terms of value.
As SB said, its like a restaurant, people keep going anyway. Kind of reminds me of *** where 5 people in row pan a provider and then a 6th writes a review saying yes she's lousy and he's surprised at how bad it was. Leaves me scratching my head....
Its not an issue of scaring anyone away from her, its more a basic question of "hey, this one looks like at least a 50% chance of pissing away $400"...
ew - probably the best post I've seen on these boards. Thanks!
I saw her a while ago and I don't get the impression that she is sliding down the tubes. I think her attitude is quite common for a lot of people her age, whatever that means. And, is she going down the tubes any faster than the average escort?
As I see it, the problem is that she is such a nice person or good looking that people think it is a pity she is in her "situation".
Perhaps a lot of peole think they are doing her a favor by saying negative things about her to "scare" people away from her. I don't know.
But I do know that my time was the mirror image of what the OP said his was. Whatever I owe her I will at least tell the truth as I see it.
I enjoyed my time a lot with her.
I don't think she is going down the tubes.
I don't think I am going to hell (at least for seeing her).
We should stop talking about her in any case because the discussion always more an exploration of the john rather than the provider.
you also have to remember that we all have our good days and bad days.....
i think janelles bad days just so happen to be on the days she doesn't drink!
and trust big time me on that last sentence. i think some of the ladies will understand exactly what i'm talking about.
Why do a lot of clubs, restaurants, etc. do decent business even though they suck now, but were once great ? You know this business is chock full of guys who go into tons of situtations where they "should know better", but we know which head is doing the thinking at the time. I'm sure there are plenty of guys who ignore the bad reviews and only focus on the good one's. You also have the "I shoulda" effect ( think of Inna and Chloe from Julie's, A1N, the Pams, etc. ). Guys always hate what they missed out on, and even if they missed out on the "good janelle", they will try making up for their "loss" by seeing "any Janelle they can", if you know what I mean.
[Edited by Ozzy on 06-26-2001 at 10:46 PM]
[Edited by Judge Crater on 07-25-2001 at 04:48 PM]
*** won't post reviews unless the girl has a website and/or e-mail address. If you reviewe Janelle and referenced the Charlesangels webite pic of her ("Becca") , they'd probably post the review....
And nothing on JAG that is written about Janelle sugarcoats the truth in any way.
So my point is: all reviews on her say that she's going down the tubes ater her fast start and her service now is okay-to-poor.
So why are people still going there to waste their $400? She doesn't advertise, so she must be getting repeat biz and/or personal recommendations. Maybe she's just erratic, as opposed to completely lousy? Could just be that she's the ultimate YMMV....
And how many of those reviews are fake reviews, just so people could avoid paying $20/month?
Just imagine if she were all over *** as well.
she's all over jag.
One interesting thing about this situation is that Janelle doesn't advertise as an indie. So anyone who is still seeing her as a indie either:
a) read a (negative) review
b) saw her through charlesangels before
c) got the number from someone else who saw her
How could she still have any customers, let alone be commanding $400 for a one single bad cup of coffee in the hour? Interesting...
Re: How about this?
Unless the point is that the service sucked. Which is what your doing with your "voter dollar". Simple business rule: There certainly is no point in throwing good money after bad.
Granted she has problems, but if she is not willing to face them herself and get the help she so obviously needs, there is no reason to continue patroning her out of some sense of "do gooder"-ism. It will only help her in the immediate short run, and if the client is on a budget like some of us, then it won't help the client at all.
Intervention only works with close friends and family, people she has a connection with. Maybe some of you are close enough, it would then be up to you. But an intervention by clients seems to be a dangerous ploy. Best bet is if you know her well enough, contact her family or convince her to do so.
thats all i'll say on the subject, I promise...
Separate names with a comma.