Oral Sex

Discussion in 'General Industry Related Topics' started by Socketome, May 8, 2001.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. Carl M

    Carl M Hanging by a thread

    Messages:
    86
    Geez being the Point man is Tough!

    Brother Crazy Train Man, Im running low, could use a fresh supply of Viagra! LOL!!
  2. Ozzy

    Ozzy

    Messages:
    15,725
    easy does it on carl.......

    he takes plenty for the team, if not for him some of us might have to bang all those LI wacko's.


    carl, how are those ear plugs hangin in? need a refill on that thorazine yet.....lol
  3. Hotpuppy

    Hotpuppy Mr.Butterworth

    Messages:
    2,190
    wsb,
    see what kind of trouble you can get in when you mess with the "butterfly" thing
    take care hp
  4. wsb

    wsb

    Messages:
    523
    Carl --

    Are you pulling my leg or are you really that dense???**I** am being sarcastic.

    --WSB
  5. Carl M

    Carl M Hanging by a thread

    Messages:
    86
    Sorry if you took it that way!

  6. Hotpuppy

    Hotpuppy Mr.Butterworth

    Messages:
    2,190
    I hear ya
    hp
  7. wsb

    wsb

    Messages:
    523
    HP --

    Sorry, but I couldn't find the message icon for sarcasm.

    CarlM --

    See answer to HP above.

    --WSB
  8. Bill Furniture

    Bill Furniture Flounder

    Messages:
    10,182
    To Plain Jane

    I've seen some guys who cannot get sexually excited about their wives after they have given birth. For that man, the wife is then a mother and he may no longer be sexually attracted (for recreational sex).
  9. Slinky Bender

    Slinky Bender The All Powerful Moderator

    Messages:
    19,495
    ( Insert answer to the query:"name two prepositions" here ).
  10. justme

    justme <i>pop and click tainted</i> Vinyl ( is dead )

    Messages:
    9,566
    Oz - sorry, perhaps I was vague. The only sentence in my previous post that was meant to be directed to you in particular wa the first. The rest of the post was to the general audience.

    To be clear: I do not think that Ozzy has said anything particularly offensive to PJ.

    Anyway, regarding the Val thing, Maybe I need to follow my own advice (regarding sensitivity), but I definitely felt like I took some flack from people other than Val.
  11. Geezy Muldoon

    Geezy Muldoon Gold

    Messages:
    2,351
    think

    [Edited by Judge Crater on 07-25-2001 at 05:43 PM]
  12. Carl M

    Carl M Hanging by a thread

    Messages:
    86
    WSB the above statement might be coincidental, but Mr Rooster Cogburn famous statement to a former beloved provider on UG is exactly the same- did you know that!!
  13. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
    I am not sure where my post was rude. But I will apologise if it was.
  14. Ozzy

    Ozzy

    Messages:
    15,725
    everything i post is rude. when did i change.


    you should catch me on a guys only boards like jag........we at least it's supposed to be guys only.



    [Edited by Ozzy on 05-08-2001 at 11:52 PM]
  15. nj george

    nj george

    Messages:
    166
    regardless of whether one thinks this is a legitimate question by a legitimate person or not i think it makes for an interesting topic for discussion. in the eyes of some gentlemen there are "good girls" and then there are "bad girls". we marry the good girls because we need them to bear our children, be our wives, and be our life mate. stereotypically speaking, there are things that good girls do and then there are some other things that bad girls do. a husband(ok some of them) does not want to be married to a bad girl and so he will reject any bad girl tendencies by her. (if you get my drift)

    as far as the insensitivity of some of these posts are concerned. i agree. i think that some are rude and disrespectful and thinly veiled as attempts at humor and "harmless" fun. there is an underlying current of visciousness with alot of this stuff. and it's not just this thread. it's evident in other threads both here and on other boards as well. we want the ladies to treat us like gentlemen and with respect and yet some act like a bunch of high school children in a boys locker room.

    funny how the folks who make rude posts themselves never think that their posts are in fact....well.....rude.
  16. Ozzy

    Ozzy

    Messages:
    15,725
    i don't think i spoke any differently to PJ than i do/did to most providers. sure some i'm a little more friendly with than others, and i've attacked more than one or two a lot worse than anything i've said here.....a lot.

    if anything i was busting on her hubby for (1) getting caught this time, (2) getting caught once before or (3) admitting to it.


    as far as val goes......in *HER* opinion, you disrespected her. i've used the words that you used on public boards......used them here on UG but i never used them in a discussion with someone like her because i know they're gonna set her off. she's not here and if anyone else had a problem with me using it, then i'd probably apologize to her/them if it meant that much to them. it's no big deal.


    :cool:

    [Edited by Ozzy on 05-08-2001 at 11:19 PM]
  17. justme

    justme <i>pop and click tainted</i> Vinyl ( is dead )

    Messages:
    9,566
    Hey Oz, don't be so sensitive. I don't see anywhere in WSB's post where he refers to your response in particular. I do agree that for the most part the tone of these replies have been at best insensitive.

    Topicallity: I think this question is far more topical than baseball, WW2, Sopranos, or rock and roll. This woman ostensibly has a very legitamate question which many people here have the expertise to answer. Would you have her post the question on a recent divorce website?

    Legitimacy: To assume that this person is baiting us seems a bit premature at this point. I know that I have answered questions seriously that I suspected may have been asked in bad faith.

    Answer: Sorry, PJ, I got none. Although some variant of Oz's suggestion seems like it could be likely.

    Agreement: Not only do I agree with WSB's assesment that the tone of response has been negative, but I also agree that this behavior is perverse when taken as a body with all the fluffball trading that some of the respondants have made a practice of making. In a somewhat heated discussion I had with Val in the early days of UG, I took a little shit for responding to her far less offensively than some of you have responded to this woman.
  18. Hotpuppy

    Hotpuppy Mr.Butterworth

    Messages:
    2,190
    WSB,
    All I was trying to say and probably should have just said it was , that this post may( if I knew how to bolden this, I would) not be what it innocently appears to be.
    You are correct that it does not explain the rudeness, though I dont see it so much as rudeness, rather having some fun at the expense of a civilian( if indeed...)
    Im curious, if you agree that the butterfly thing is sycophantic, why sign off with it?
    Take care HP
  19. Ozzy

    Ozzy

    Messages:
    15,725
    i don't remember asking anyone to eat me. "blow me" maybe, "fuck you" definitely.......but eat me? i don't think i used that one yet.


    and yes, i should give credit to bobby D as paul vitti, in "analyze this" though i did change a word or two.
  20. wsb

    wsb

    Messages:
    523
    HP --

    So, you are saying that it's more logical to assume: (i) Plain Jane is a man [baby], (ii) she's a provider (which seems irrelevant), (iii) the post is just a rouse designed to what???

    I suppose you could be correct about any or all of the foregoing, but those are pretty big assumptions from so little data and, in any event, it doesn't really explain the rudeness exhibited by those who seem to have a penchant for courting cyberscorts (although it may explain why they need to do so). Of course, in at least one case it may just be a lack of profit motive.

    Ditto on the butterfly thing.

    --WSB