Discussion in 'Northern New Jersey' started by larry1017, Dec 10, 2001.
painful for whom?
I hear ya Nixie.But the thought of doing that.freaks me out.Especially after looking at her picture.NYC is right.Those nipples do look downright painfull.Ill stick to krissy .
I just want to clarify something. Some people are interested in pregnant girls NOT because of BBFS potential. There is something to the look. Maybe it's the belly or maybe it's the breasts. Maybe it is just because it seems forbidden. Of course, there's always the glow. Just thought I would shed some light on the situation.
yes she is . . .
and her nipples look painful!!
Not something I'm into at all - but for all you "Pregnant Provider" seekers out there, check out the NJ Jewels Daily page today. Gillian is definitely available and definitely pregnant....
Bill.... please don't dent the head
I'm sure that most providers are on the pill as a standard thing. And we've established that BBFS does happen more than you expect. So I doubt that people are seeing pregnant providers for BBFS.
as to why someone would purposely seek out a pregnant provider, I don't have the answer to that. But I can tell you that being with a pregnant woman is clearly HMMV. For some women, the hormonal changes makes them want and enjoy it more, some to the point where it seems like they can't get enough.
When my ex was pregnant with all three of our kids, after the throwing up period in the first trimester, it got to the point where I actually had to turn her down.
Also, not to mention that women do give off that certain "glow" when they are pregnant that for some reason (it is probably buried deep into our animal instincts) makes them seem more attractive than when they are not. And the way the hormones makes the breasts become fuller is a big plus too.
While I certainly would not go out of my way to look for a pregnant provider, I certainly would not discount one that was unless it was clearly very late in the pregnancy and the risk to the child was greater. I would say, though, that being with a pregnant provider so you can go BB without the risk of pregnancy is a weak excuse, since it doesn't protect you from disease.
i'm with sammy
What can be hoped for with a session from a pregnant provider except if she lets you go BB - which is still a scary thought because you are not the only one doing it. You guys like drinking her milk or something?
there is a distinction between "as low rent as you can get" or "as low rent as you are willing to go".
I think the question of what's as low rent as you can possibly get at least deserves its own thread.
I'm not sure that I would do a preg woman, but for those who are into it, I say live and let live. As long the woman is fine with it and there is no medical harm. For the Johns, the attraction is probably the idea of accessing a woman who is biologically connected with some other guy - maybe a territorial thing.
By the way, I once dated a woman who chose to have a child and raise it on her own ( she got an anonymous sperm donor ). This woman said that, during her pregnacy, she was horny as hell. So she dated a lot, since she was single and didn't have a husband. According to her, lots of average guys were cool with the whole thing, including sex.
Is pregnant provider sex really all that more objectionable than schoolgirl outfits, anal, submissiveness or any other fantasy, especially when you are already in the territory of sex-for-pay? Kind of reminds me of the mainstream porn guys (Vivid etc) deriding the lower-budget indies as "gonzo" porn. Come on - its all past the point where social classification and genteel sensibilities are relevant....
I am going to affirm the Judge's decision in this matter.
Call me old fashioned, but I think screwing a pregnant prostitute is about as low rent as you can possibly get.
What's the big deal?
What is it that I don't get from having sex with a pregnant woman? What's so thrilling about it other than a weird experience? Or is it just the weird sensation everybody is going for? Since she can't be inpregnated by you, will the girl allow you to go BB or something?
back to the topic...
So what have we concluded?
Are there no pregnant and/or lactating women around?
This is not good for the population. The Census Bureau will be unhappy.
Of course, if you suspect someone may or may not be expecting, I suppose I could inspect the suspect for you!
It's much easier to simply not enforce a law than it is to repeal one (at least as far as most state legislatures are concerned).
Re: Re: How can Greek be considered cautious?
You would be surprised how weird some of the sex laws in states can get. OK, maybe not surprised, but amused. One of my friends grew up in Montana, and they still have a law on their books that say it is against the law to have sex on your front lawn with socks on.
Re: How can Greek be considered cautious?
Greek=sadistic???? I think it depends on how you do it.
As far as legal exposure, depending on the state Greek could get you charged with sodomy. Then again, in many of those same states French can get you charged with sodomy as well.
is almost 8 months pregnant and she will come to NJ. http://www.geocities.com/trulyscrumshus
Separate names with a comma.