She's Baaaaack - OhCharley

Discussion in 'New York' started by littleguy, Feb 23, 2001.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. boris

    boris

    Messages:
    24
    found this thread

    After all this, did any of you actually see her in March? :}

    I noticed that she's getting ready to tour again and may be coming through New York.
  2. dicer5

    dicer5

    Messages:
    61
    frog,

    Now I understand where you are coming from and do get your point of view.
  3. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
    dicer, I am not accusing jm to be a liar. He has explained that a different jm persona saw Charley. However, if someone does lie about seeing a provider, my future interpretations of his comments will be coloured accordingly. Example, you post about amazin' annie and how she is the bomb. Someone chimes in with a false "yeah, I saw her last month as well, awesome!!" comment. What does that say about that person? I would say this is a person desperately desiring attention and perhaps a pat on the head. Not (necessarily) evil mind you, but in constant need of reassurance and affirmation (and by the way, would be a high maintenance significant other). How is this wrong you ask? Well, it skews the votes for that provider. If there are NO dissents, then perhaps the point is moot, but it will still present an inaccurate view.

    btw, the fact that someone uses multiple personae also makes me have certain biases on his words.

    Sorry to take up so much space but you questioned.
  4. guy catelli

    guy catelli

    Messages:
    478
    dicer,

    i understand now. actually, it's what you said the first time. but, somehow it didn't 'crystalize' until i read your restatement. thanks for taking the trouble.

    guy
  5. dicer5

    dicer5

    Messages:
    61
    gc,

    let me try to explain(if i'm not clear let me know). What i'm saying is - most of the arguments I've seen here is when guys accuse of each other of lying about seeing women is that in all the cases I've read - Both sides always agree that the woman in question is a great lady and recommend her. So my point was this, what does it matter if a guys is lying or telling the truth about seeing a certain lady. If she is highly recommended from both sides, is it worth the accusations and arguments. I don't know if frog was saying he agreed or he was saying it does matter if a guy does lie. And the last point I made was(this is more my point of view), that I always think there's a certain amount of truth and lies in what a lady tells the guy she sees and what a guy may post. If this is the case, than is it worth it to get into an argument on the boards on a subject that will never really be resolved on the boards. Hope this clears up my previous posts; if not let me know.
  6. guy catelli

    guy catelli

    Messages:
    478
    sorry, dicer 5. i've reread the whole thread -- and read your last post 3 times. i understand perfectly what frog is saying (not always the case ;)), but i'm not following the point you are trying to make.


    [Edited by guy catelli on 03-04-2001 at 02:53 PM]
  7. dicer5

    dicer5

    Messages:
    61
    frog,

    i know what you're saying but what i was referring to was this. most of the arguments regarding someone seeing or not seeing someone never comes up when it refers to a woman who they had a bad time with. All the inconsistencies are always regarding woman who everyone seems to have a great time with. And then the argument surfaces about how "he never saw her bec. she said told me so" or something along those lines. What I was referring to was towards those types, where it seems to be a concensus that those women are very sweet and everyone who writes about them has a great time. So what I was referring to was, then what does it matter is A saw B or not. Instead of reflecting on the fact that the woman was everything they expected, it always deviates from that subject into accusations of this and that. I assume that there is truth and lies to both sides, the woman and guys, but I also assume that to a certain extent, that is the nature of this industry.
  8. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
    I meant that there are many different points of view, and sides to a story. So if I say that I had a good time with Ms X but you said she was terrible, we would have two divergent views, yet neither of us have to be incorrect necessarily. If, however, I said I saw Ms X (and she was great or was terrible) and Ms X says she has never seen frog, then one of us is wrong -- unless I was in disguise, like apparently jm claims to have been.
  9. dicer5

    dicer5

    Messages:
    61
    frog,
    can you elaborate on the "did A see B? allows for no relativism." are you saying that doesn't matter(which I would agree with), or are you saying it does matter to you? Just curious
  10. badz

    badz Bronze

    Messages:
    99
    .

    .

    [Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:05 PM]
  11. jmcurry

    jmcurry The Insider

    Messages:
    485
    Whassup: Thanks for watching my back. I, too, am sadly finding UG taking on the nastier aspects of TBD.

    Badz: If you have a critique, let's hear it. If you would rather do this privately, I am most amenable. But just make certain that you get your facts right. If your epistemological paradigm is shaky, your argument will be as well. As an aside, lying is not my forte. The reviews I post are sincere, and the providers whom I have seen will testify to my conduct and veracity. In fact, you and I seem to share a proclivity for one particular provider. Ask her whether or not I am trustworthy. I am in this hobby for recreation and satisfaction. The last thing I care to do is argue with other hobbyists. I would rather share information, so that everyone can enjoy the best that the hobby has to offer. But when you call my integrity into question with unsubstantiated evidence, I feel the need to respond.
  12. whasssup

    whasssup

    Messages:
    58
    I'm sorry. I thought I was on Utopia Guide not TBD.
  13. robnotbob

    robnotbob

    Messages:
    2,912
    Yes, but

    whassup..who vouches for you???

    rnb: lightening the mood (or trying to)

    BTW I think I saw ozzy as me, or ozzy was me when I saw him, and I posted the worst review about myself.....
  14. whasssup

    whasssup

    Messages:
    58
    Vouching for JMCurry

    Guys, I can vouch for JM Curry. We have exchanged info over emails and thru phone conversations. In fact, he took me to an new incall place in the city that does not advertise. Cut the guy some slack. His posts are always sincere and forthcoming and I find his posts to be informative and honest. JM Curry is a good guy and does not deserved to be bad mouthed on the board.
  15. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
    On many matters, I agree with dicer's view. But the question "did A see B?" allows for no relativism.
  16. dicer5

    dicer5

    Messages:
    61
    On the topic of people talking about seeing people and other people saying they never saw them-question is does it really matter? if you had a good time with the woman you're with, what does it matter if she saw this guy or that guy. I always assume there is truth in both what the guy says and what the woman says. Also, there are exaggerations in what the guy says and what the woman says. So, if you're heaving a great time with whoever you're seeing, it shouldn't matter who she saw or who she didn't see.
  17. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
  18. Ozzy

    Ozzy

    Messages:
    15,725
  19. GenrsMale

    GenrsMale

    Messages:
    4
    So Ozzy.........who really is vv ????? The world wants to know..........drum roll please.........lol
  20. frog

    frog

    Messages:
    1,059
    sure oz, whatever you say ;)