www.escorts.com

Discussion in 'New York' started by ExLS, Feb 11, 2003.

Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. kesey

    kesey

    Messages:
    42
    Re: I'm 0-2 so far

    I saw Linda Luver, who was a complete waste of my time and money, she didn't look like her picture, she was a lot heavier, charged way too much at $250 per hour and wanted to rush my out. the only reddeming quality was that she gave a pretty good bbbj. I'll stick with the boards and recommendations. [/B][/QUOTE]


    Just curious, danielNYC gave her a pretty good review. Do you think your bad experience was a case of your disappointment at her looks and a bad vibe caused by this or did it seem to be her standard MO
  2. Happy Hooker

    Happy Hooker

    Messages:
    1,396
    I have been on escorts.com for two years. Its been ok..not great, just ok.

    There is one problem about escorts.com you all may need to check. For whatever reason it will reset your settings for getting mail notification. So either she isnt getting your replies, or you are not getting hers. Either way check your settings often.
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2003
  3. THE MIKESTER

    THE MIKESTER Bronze

    Messages:
    0
    I AM sure some of the adds on escort.com are real. but just look at the interview pages on some of them and you can see some of these are just plain old bogus.... IMHO... MICHAEL
  4. benthere69

    benthere69

    Messages:
    464
    I can echo the sentiments of others on this subject...lots of non-replies. However, I did hook up with Taylor (erotika3). She is my only date thus far from escorts.com and she was everything advertised and much more. Taylor is one of my top five all time favorites. I also have detriotsannie on my must-do list. I guess it's hit or miss on this site.
  5. THE MIKESTER

    THE MIKESTER Bronze

    Messages:
    0
    COOKIE...rest assured you are not the pa provider i am talking about... michael
  6. Cookypuss

    Cookypuss

    Messages:
    129
    I have been on escorts.com since day one

    but my experience is this ~ for me ~ i get hit with an enormous amount of inquiries from young, very very young gents that think my advertisement stating my specialty is first timers ~ means virgins..I am grateful for the delete button..
    Based on my gents that have dabbled they have shared NIGHTMARE stories with me and some stories have been a-ok, but not great..Quite coomon i hear the driver at the door scenario, and she splits after the monies are given..It makes me very, very upset...Never heard a gent state he had a GREAT time with a lady from there, unless of course he is talking about me.heh heh
    .Its all about research, i think..If a lady ONLY advertises on that site and no where else, you are already at a loss in my opinion.
  7. THE MIKESTER

    THE MIKESTER Bronze

    Messages:
    0
    many adds are phoney on escort.com. i learened the hard way. set up a meeting with a not to be named pa provider.she never showed up. never ******ed me back. i ******ed several ladies who i thought looked good, no reply. caution... mike in upstate ny
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2003
  8. outlook

    outlook

    Messages:
    17
    yes that Eve Girl

    Sure enough, for the cost, I thought I could have done better. Of course it could be apples and oranges.
  9. Thorn

    Thorn

    Messages:
    7,772
    Bingo. Ditto. Right on. Give me five.

    Stuff like that there...

    BTW, I think JL will agree, there are more then a few twisted johns on the other side of that dirty coin. It isn't just the providers. However, it is they who are selling, and by regular standards ought to have some mark that sets the industry standard [agreeing that "regular standards" can't be used though because there is nothing regular, or standard, about this industry]. Shame that.
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2003
  10. Daniel_NYC

    Daniel_NYC

    Messages:
    1,847
    I use escorts.com on a regular basis. I have had some good sessions, lots of unanswered ******s, and then, well, that's where I found Marianne Miller.

    Nuff said.

    It ain't all bad though, our own board favourite BL has an ad there if you know where to look.

    Like seperating the wheat from the chaff.
  11. kromrider

    kromrider

    Messages:
    1,240
    Re: I'm 0-2 so far

    Our very own Eve Girl?
  12. generousguy

    generousguy

    Messages:
    165
    saw longlegs or leggy...

    something like that, face and looks are below average and is overpriced...not reccomended..can do better with a p/u in a bar. the site does not screen ads and is prone to rip-offs or spam mail...stick with reliable ( is there such a thing) reviews and sources.
  13. outlook

    outlook

    Messages:
    17
    I'm 0-2 so far

    I didn't get a great vibe from escorts.com, but it could also be my selection process. I saw a girl named Eve Girl, who gave a decent but uninspired session, and I saw Linda Luver, who was a complete waste of my time and money, she didn't look like her picture, she was a lot heavier, charged way too much at $250 per hour and wanted to rush my out. the only reddeming quality was that she gave a pretty good bbbj. I'll stick with the boards and recommendations.
  14. kromrider

    kromrider

    Messages:
    1,240
    One if the best sessions i ever had with a provider was from an Escorts.com ad. (see my review in the Carolinas section from last year) But i have sent out tons of ****** and received no replys so I guess it is hit or miss.
  15. ExLS

    ExLS banned

    Messages:
    2,004
    thanks for the heads up
  16. LOUMA

    LOUMA

    Messages:
    346
    i agree, i like using eros, i guess we all have to use the usual Caveats--
    but the more we post reviews, the more helpful we can be toward the greater hobby/ provider community
  17. JohnBoy

    JohnBoy

    Messages:
    149
    escorts.com

    They've redone the site. It used to be yellow & green and have a amateur quality to it. And I believe the girls can submit their ads for free. Their are no censors to make sure the ads are legit. Buyer beware.
  18. jackhenry

    jackhenry

    Messages:
    427
    Shhhhhhhh

    It's our dirty little secret!!
  19. justlooking

    justlooking

    Messages:
    25,481
    At risk of being boring, I'd like to repeat my usual mantra.

    Ad sites aren't "realiable" or "unreliable". Advertisers are. It isn't really Eros's fault that a lot of the ads that people pay them to publish are misleading or that a lot of the advertisers enage in other bad practices. It's the fault of the advertisers. (I personally think that on the whole Eros-NY has a remarkably high percentage of "good" ads.)

    What I really think is that anybody who doesn't expect the vast majority of commercial sex ads to be misleading or otherwise flawed is naive. This industry is dirty. Most of the people in it are dirty. If a site has a lot of ads, then most of them are gonna be bad. Because there just aren't that many honest advertisers out there.
  20. ExLS

    ExLS banned

    Messages:
    2,004
    Hey gang,

    I was roaming through the net and discovered www.escorts.com
    I saw some providers from here and some new ones.
    Question is:
    How reliable are they? Are they like eros? Some ino would help